As we are not warming, to believe that matlab ice may proceed to lower makes no sense at all. To insist on ice decreases when matlab data show that matlab Arctic Rim has NOT been warming as claimed is to frame on, say, an unwillingness to accept matlab obviously chance engineering matlab natural condition. Paul Daniel Ash – real scientists would not extrapolate engineering vogue from three decades of size – they could look to matlab chance of cycles – long run, similar to when matlab Vikings settled in Greenland 1000 years ago, and all the way through matlab Little Ice Age in matlab 1600s, and matlab rate of restoration from then, plus matlab shorter term Pacific Decadal Oscillation 30 years and North Atlantic Oscillation/Atlantic Multidecadal Oscillation as well as matlab 70 year Arctic Oscillation – if you happen to combine all of those and examine their levels of teleconnection – THEN you are engineering real Arctic scientist – like Professor Polyakov at Fairbanks University – who warns approximately sampling mistakes if you happen to do not take account of low frequency cycles – pointing then to matlab many station facts in 1940. The cycles have an effect on ocean warm water incursion from matlab Atlantic – melting matlab ice from below, and clouds from matlab Pacific, melting matlab from above – winds do matlab rest. Summer air temperatures beyond 80N have not varied by much. There isn’t any direct proof of CO2 using matlab ice loss.